A Guide to Paradigmatic Self-Marginalization: Lessons for Post-Keynesian Economists
ثبت نشده
چکیده
While many heterodox economic scholars hope for a paradigmatic change in economics due to the great financial crisis, this paper emphasizes that path-dependent elements and institutional factors within the economic community constitute a substantial barrier for paradigmatic change. Focusing on the citation behavior of economists in heterodox journals in general and in Post-Keynesian journals in particular, we discuss some structural reasons for the marginalization of heterodox economic thought in connection with the positive feedback mechanisms provided by the institutional framework of the economic discipline.
منابع مشابه
Finding common ground between ecological economics and post-Keynesian economics
a r t i c l e i n f o Post-Keynesian economics and ecological economics have in common that they are considered to be 'heterodox' schools of thought. Aside from that, there has not been a strong connection between them. Previous books on post-Keynesian economics contain no chapter on environmental or ecological issues. This neglect has led leading ecological economists to criticize post-Keynesi...
متن کاملTrying to Make Sense of the Principle of Effective Demand
Most of the scholarly reinterpretations of the Principle of Effective Demand are not in line with Keynes’s original presentation of it in Chapter 3 of the General Theory. To substantiate this claim, Keynes’s definition is here first reproduced and then compared with different reinterpretations of the principle by textbook authors, and Neo-Ricardian, Kaleckian, and Post Keynesian economists. A n...
متن کامل2 Comparing Responses to Critical Realism
This paper is a study of the response of two heterodox schools of economic thought to ‘new’ philosophical ideas. Specifically, it considers the response within Post Keynesian and Feminist economics to Tony Lawson’s recent call for economists to pay greater attention to ontology and for economists to adopt research methods consistent with critical realism. Lawson’s arguments were formally introd...
متن کاملKeynesian, Old Keynesian, and New Keynesian Wage Nominalism
Wage nominalism has long been a puzzle for economists. The original Keynesian explanation related it to a coordination failure in the context of decentralized union bargaining, a problem now in a largely nonunion U. S. labor market. Moreover, Keynesianism assumed wage nominalism as the norm rather than explaining it. New Keynesian explanations, based on implicit contracts, menu costs, and other...
متن کاملNew Keynesian Economics: A Monetary Perspective
S ince John Maynard Keynes wrote the General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money in 1936, Keynesian economics has been highly influential among academics and policymakers. Keynes has certainly had his detractors, though, with the most influential being Milton Friedman, Robert Lucas, and Edward C. Prescott. Monetarist thought, the desire for stronger theoretical foundations in macroeconomi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009